The Sinclair PC200 was an attempt by Amstrad using the Sinclair name to make a personal computer more in line with a desktop PC, aimed at the small business user. It boasted an Intel 8086 CPU, CGA graphics and built-in 720k floppy drive and 512k RAM. With a price tag of £300 which is £820 in 2020 ($1,080) compared to the £1000+ of a normal PC at the time, this left no room for anything else. Like a hard drive, as almost every other PC used.
Those who know their old computer will notice how similar the PC200 looks to the Atari 520-ST. The specifications are almost identical, and the PC200 was designed as an alternative to the Atari. While Amstrad teamed up with Sinclair to produce the PC200, Amstrad themselves were selling the PC20, which was in fact identical to the PC200 except for the colour, and the additional TV output on the PC200 (40 column mode).
The PC200 can boot into Dos 3.3 from floppy, where more programs can then be loaded. Digital Research’s GEM desktop could be loaded if the computer was running a CGA monitor. Two 8-bit ISA slots are available, though due to the design of the case, the cards would stick out the top of the computer. A maths co-processor was also available. An analogue joystick was available, as was the obligatory Amstrad mouse (in black).
Needless to say the PC200 was a complete failure. The CGA graphics were poor, when other (be it more expensive) PC’s were using EGA or VGA. The lack of a hard drive was another huge set back. The PC was in production for only 3 months.
| Year | 1988 |
| Make & Model | Sinclair PC200 |
| Generation | 4th |
| CPU | Intel 8086 |
| Speed | 8MHz |
| RAM & ROM | 512k RAM, 64k Video RAM 16k ROM |
| Power | 240V 38W |
| Exhibit No. | 1330 |
4 Comments
Gowza · July 28, 2020 at 11:53 pm
Burned the midnight oil on one of these to pass my Higher Diploma in the early 90s, everything else was still using 5.25″ floppies, twice the size or 3 times the price.
Did everything I needed for college and a bit more. Still have it and the disks in the cupboard!
Dempsey · October 11, 2020 at 12:19 am
Failure it might have been and it might have lacked features, but it was an affordable entry to the PC world! It was a lot cheaper than other entry-level PCs here in Finland. And that’s why I was able to purchase it. 16-bit “home computers” such as Amiga and Atari ST were the alternative, but I kind of wanted to move to the PC world because I knew that’s where the future was and I figured it would be beneficial to start mastering that environment. And I liked the “professional” aspect of that platform and all the exclusive software that were available for it, after years of 8-bit home/toy computers… 🙂
Ted Mitchell · February 23, 2022 at 4:08 am
“Those who know their old computer will notice how similar the PC200 looks to the Atari 520-ST. ”
Not quite. It doesn’t look like a 520-ST at all… it looks a whole lot like a Commodore 128 though…
bob · February 22, 2023 at 7:55 pm
I had one of these with the hard disk sticking out of the top. No idea even what size that disk was now to my shame. I asked my parent for a pc for college and this is what I got. Loved gem publisher had loads of fun to be fair. Turbo Pascal as well.